Loading...
A not-for-profit organisation
committed to injured people
A not-for-profit organisation
committed to injured people

Preserving access to justice for those injured through clinical negligence

APIL is dedicated to challenging the rhetoric around clinical negligence claims; highlighting the dangers of proposals that would impede access to justice for those injured through clinical negligence, and proposing alternative actions that will get to the root of the issues.

APIL’s research report - Clinical Negligence: the reality behind the myths

APIL’s latest research report delves into the current debate around clinical negligence compensation, and tackles the myths that incorrectly inform much of the discussion around these claims and their cost. Our extensive research and analysis looks at:

  • The importance of compensation and legal support to victims of clinical negligence
  • What is actually driving clinical negligence spending
  • The dangers of proposals which would reduce access to justice and compensation

Read APIL’s report

Members of APIL can view all of APIL’s research publications in the members’ research area.

APIL’s plan for reform

As well as challenging misconceptions and flawed suggestions for reform, APIL has put forward a plan setting out where the Government should focus efforts to truly tackle the fundamental problems giving rise to clinical negligence costs.

Instead of radical reform and upheaval of the clinical negligence claims process, there must be an urgent focus on reduction of harm; increased transparency when things go wrong; and amendments to the existing legal framework to ensure greater efficiency for those harmed by negligence seeking justice and support.

Read APIL’s plan for reform

Our previous work in this area

House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts - Costs of clinical negligence

In 2025, the House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts, commonly known as the Public Accounts Committee, launched an inquiry into the costs of clinical negligence . In the call for evidence, the committee was interested to know what has contributed to the costs.

In written evidence, APIL told the committee that delays in delivering redress to injured patients and the rising cost of social care are driving the NHS' compensation bill. APIL also warned against possible reforms, which could put at risk an injured patient's recovery.

APIL's written evidence

House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee inquiry - NHS litigation reform

In September 2021 the House of Commons Health and Social Care Select Committee launched an inquiry into NHS litigation reform . The call for evidence from the committee included questions about “blame culture”, possible changes to NHS litigation, and how to improve learning.

In written evidence to the committee, APIL called for a more joined-up approach to patient safety, and recommended that the new Patient Safety Commissioner is given a wider remit to include all areas of patient safety, and act as a link between patients, regulators, the NHS, and policy-makers. APIL also warned against changes which would result in injured patients being under-compensated. This warning was later repeated by APIL executive committee member Guy Forster during an oral evidence session with the committee.

APIL’s written evidence to the committee

Transcript of the oral evidence provided by APIL executive committee member Guy Forster to the committee - 13 January 2022

Health and Social Care Committee report - NHS litigation reform