Loading...
A not-for-profit organisation
committed to injured people
A not-for-profit organisation
committed to injured people

Attendance notes 2025

CPD
1 hour
Target audience
Any level

There have been at least three cases over the previous few months where attendance notes taken by solicitors have played a significant part in the outcome of a case, appeal or application.  These notes protected a solicitor against complaints of mis-advising and helped with issues relating to the assessment of costs, including solicitor and own client costs.  

This webinar covers many of the essential issues relating to attendance notes in litigation, and generally.

WHAT THE WEBINAR COVERS

  • Recent cases on attendance notes
  • The professional obligation to keep attendance notes
  • Attendance notes in court. What would happen if a judge looked at your notes?
  • Attendance notes and “self-protection”.
  • Attendance notes on the assessment of costs

It also looks at cases where attendance notes have been considered and the significant role they can play in relation to allegations of misconduct, the litigation process (when a client is making a complaint about a solicitor)  and the assessment of costs.

JUDICIAL OBSERVATIONS ON ATTENDANCE NOTES

“…the best evidence is the file note. It is a contemporaneous record made in connection with the provision of professional services“
 (HHJ Keyser KC, sitting as a High Court Judge in Mundil-Williams v Williams & Ors [2021] EWHC 586 (Ch))
 
“… where a substantial conference takes place between solicitors and counsel I would normally expect to see a detailed record of the conference itself. Without such a record an element of doubt inevitably arises, not so much as to the time actually spent but as to whether it can fully be justified. In such circumstances, it is necessary to take a conservative approach, as it is where it is unclear exactly what work is being done or what the outcome might have been”
Costs Judge Leonard in Allseas Group SA, R (On the Application Of) v Sultana [2023] EWHC 2731 (SCCO)
 
“It is a sad and highly regrettable finding that the attendance note of 2 November misrepresents the true position as I find it to be and it is not a conclusion that I reach lightly”
HHJ Saffman in Mansion Estates Ltd v Hayre & Co (a firm) [2016] EWHC 96 (Ch)
 

Presented by Gordon Exall

Barrister
Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester and Birmingham and 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London

Gordon was called to the Bar in 1991 having originally qualified and practised as a solicitor. He practices from Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester and Birmingham and 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London. He works in the area of personal injury litigation and in the law relating to civil procedure, limitation and costs. He has a particular interest in issues relating to damages, evidence, costs and procedure.  

Gordon is a former executive committee member of APIL and has lectured widely for APIL and CPIL on personal injury and procedure topics. Gordon is the author of  Personal Injury Practice Notes (Cavendish); The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents (now in its 4th edition); the 14th edition of Munkman and Exall on Damages for Personal Injury Death and Periodical Payments the New Law. He also wrote the section on limitation for the APIL loose-leaf and contributes two chapters to Munkman on Employer’s Liability... view full biography

Personal injury legal training header
Published
15 September 2025
On-demand recording
Available from 15 September 2025
Delegate rate
From £90 + VAT
Personal injury legal training header
Live or on-demand

Join live to take part in polls, ask questions, and get the full interactive experience.

Unable to attend live? No problem - everyone who registers will receive access to the on-demand recording, available to watch anytime for up to six months.