Webinar Overview
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Attersley v UK Insurance Ltd has sharpened the costs risks faced by claimants who accept a Part 36 offer outside the relevant period. While a claimant who accepts late remains subject to fixed recoverable costs up to the expiry of the relevant period, the defendant may recover its post-expiry costs on the standard basis, creating a potentially significant financial exposure.
At the same time, defendants are increasingly deploying very early Part 36 offers, sometimes before medical evidence is obtained or quantum can be reliably assessed. These early offers place claimant solicitors in a difficult position:
- Reject too quickly, and the client risks adverse costs consequences if the offer is later beaten.
- Accept too soon, and the claim may settle at an undervalue.
- Delay acceptance, and exposure to the defendant’s costs may arise.
This webinar examines the strategic, procedural, and professional tensions created by early Part 36 offers. It explains the relevant rules, explores developing appellate guidance, and provides practical, risk-managed approaches to advising clients when evidence is incomplete.
Through practical examples and analysis of recent authorities, the session equips practitioners with clear, structured guidance on managing early Part 36 offers safely, effectively, and defensibly.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this webinar, participants will be able to:
-
Understand the purpose and mechanics of Part 36 offers, including how they operate within the Civil Procedure Rules framework.
-
Analyse the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Attersley v UK Insurance Ltd for late acceptance of Part 36 offers, particularly the costs consequences for claimants.
-
Assess the strategic risks posed by very early Part 36 offers, especially where medical or quantum evidence is incomplete.
-
Explain the interaction between Part 36 and fixed recoverable costs (FRC), including when fixed costs apply and when costs may be assessed.
-
Evaluate the professional and negligence risks arising from advising clients to accept or reject early offers.
-
Provide structured, defensible advice to clients where valuation evidence is incomplete or evolving.
-
Implement practical steps to protect both the client’s position and the solicitor, including documentation, evidence gathering, and tactical responses.
Barrister
Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester and Birmingham and 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London
Gordon was called to the Bar in 1991 having originally qualified and practised as a solicitor. He practices from Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester and Birmingham and 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London. He works in the area of personal injury litigation and in the law relating to civil procedure, limitation and costs. He has a particular interest in issues relating to damages, evidence, costs and procedure.
Gordon is a former executive committee member of APIL and has lectured widely for APIL and CPIL on personal injury and procedure topics. Gordon is the author of Personal Injury Practice Notes (Cavendish); The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents (now in its 4th edition); the 14th edition of Munkman and Exall on Damages for Personal Injury Death and Periodical Payments the New Law. He also wrote the section on limitation for the APIL loose-leaf and contributes two chapters to Munkman on Employer’s Liability... view full biography